tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1374491146643888253.post6633616040209879604..comments2008-11-26T13:05:36.054-06:00Brian N Larsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17026714100373711405noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1374491146643888253.post-51237404737558750672008-11-26T13:05:00.000-06:002008-11-26T13:05:00.000-06:00

Thanks for this, Brian. It answers some questions, and raises others.<BR/><BR/>So based on your response...<BR/><BR/>1) An MLS public website is not subject to the VOW signup requirement.<BR/><BR/>2) An MLS can create truly ridiculous IDX rules, because IDX was not covered by the NAR-DOJ settlement.<BR/><BR/>3) An MLS cannot not prohibit brokers/agents from sending listings to Trulia/Zillow/etc.

Rob Hahnhttp://www.notorious-rob.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1374491146643888253.post-41548396941513405662008-11-24T20:53:00.000-06:002008-11-24T20:53:00.000-06:00

Brian:<BR/><BR/>Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and analysis of this case. It should be an interesting few years as VOWs become more prevalent and MLS' switch to public-facing sites.

Brad Nixhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16733430844887144039noreply@blogger.com